Don Beads v. Maryland State Police
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-03219-WDQ. Copies to all parties and the district court. . [16-1128]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DON J. BEADS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
September 20, 2016
October 13, 2016
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland,
Phillip M. Pickus, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
Beads v. Md. State Police, No. 1:12-cv-03219-
WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 13, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?