Don Beads v. Maryland State Police

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-03219-WDQ. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999946405]. [16-1128]

Appeal: 16-1128

Doc: 28

Filed: 10/13/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1128

DON J. BEADS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND STATE
SHERIDAN,

POLICE;

MARCUS

L.

BROWN;

TERRENCE

B.

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:12-cv-03219-WDQ)

Submitted:

September 20, 2016

Decided:

October 13, 2016

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tonya
Baña,
TONYA
BAÑA,
LLC,
Pikesville,
Maryland,
for
Appellant.
Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland,
Phillip M. Pickus, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1128

Doc: 28

Filed: 10/13/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Don

Beads

Defendants

appeals

summary

the

judgment

district
on

court’s

Beads’

race

order

granting

discrimination

claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964,

as

amended,

42

U.S.C.

§§ 2000e

to

2000e-17

(2012),

42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration
of Rights.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

Beads v. Md. State Police, No. 1:12-cv-03219-

WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 13, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2