David Montgomery v. Conmed, Inc.
Filing
OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00930-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: M. Anderson, D. Montgomery. [999801163] [16-1133]
Appeal: 16-1133
Doc: 25
Filed: 04/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1133
DAVID MICHAEL MONTGOMERY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CONMED, INC.,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
JASON BINGHAM, Cpl.; JOHN CARHART, Sgt.; SENIOR TROOPER
CLAYCOMB; FRANK FORNOSS, Str.; STRED WINKLER, Senior
Trooper; SGT.
GALLIGAN; SCOTT PEDERSON; K. R. JENKINS,
Officer; JAMIE GROVER, Officer; CHRIS TAYLOR, Tfc.; EDWARD
EICHER, Sgt.; TPR
BISHOP; THE
CARROLL COUNTY JAIL; MR.
HARDINGER, Warden; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLICE; STATE POLICE
WESTMINSTER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-00930-ELH)
Submitted:
April 19, 2016
Decided:
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
April 22, 2016
Appeal: 16-1133
Doc: 25
Filed: 04/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
David Michael Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Althauser,
Megan Green Anderson, Eric Matthew Rigatuso, ECCLESTON & WOLF,
PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-1133
Doc: 25
Filed: 04/22/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
David
court’s
Michael
order
complaint.
Montgomery
denying
relief
seeks
on
appeal
42
his
to
the
U.S.C.
district
§ 1983
(2012)
The notice of appeal was received in the district
court shortly after expiration of the appeal period.
Because
Montgomery is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of
the
date
it
was
properly
mailing to the court.
delivered
to
prison
officials
for
Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack,
487 U.S. 266 (1988).
The record does not reveal when Montgomery
gave
appeal
the
notice
Accordingly,
we
of
remand
the
to
prison
case
for
officials
the
for
limited
mailing.
purpose
of
allowing the district court to obtain this information from the
parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under
Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack.
The record, as
supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further
consideration.
REMANDED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?