David Montgomery v. Conmed, Inc.

Filing

OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00930-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: M. Anderson, D. Montgomery. [999801163] [16-1133]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1133 Doc: 25 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1133 DAVID MICHAEL MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CONMED, INC., Defendant – Appellee, and JASON BINGHAM, Cpl.; JOHN CARHART, Sgt.; SENIOR TROOPER CLAYCOMB; FRANK FORNOSS, Str.; STRED WINKLER, Senior Trooper; SGT. GALLIGAN; SCOTT PEDERSON; K. R. JENKINS, Officer; JAMIE GROVER, Officer; CHRIS TAYLOR, Tfc.; EDWARD EICHER, Sgt.; TPR BISHOP; THE CARROLL COUNTY JAIL; MR. HARDINGER, Warden; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLICE; STATE POLICE WESTMINSTER, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00930-ELH) Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. April 22, 2016 Appeal: 16-1133 Doc: 25 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 David Michael Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Althauser, Megan Green Anderson, Eric Matthew Rigatuso, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-1133 Doc: 25 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: David court’s Michael order complaint. Montgomery denying relief seeks on appeal 42 his to the U.S.C. district § 1983 (2012) The notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Because Montgomery is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly mailing to the court. delivered to prison officials for Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The record does not reveal when Montgomery gave appeal the notice Accordingly, we of remand the to prison case for officials the for limited mailing. purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?