David Montgomery v. Conmed, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999788021-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999778535-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00930-ELH. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Megan Anderson & David Montgomery. [16-1133]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DAVID MICHAEL MONTGOMERY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Defendant - Appellee,
JASON BINGHAM, Cpl.; JOHN CARHART, Sgt.; SENIOR TROOPER
CLAYCOMB; FRANK FORNOSS, Str.; STRED WINKLER, Senior
Trooper; SGT. GALLIGAN; SCOTT PEDERSON; K. R. JENKINS,
Officer; JAMIE GROVER, Officer; CHRIS TAYLOR, Tfc.; EDWARD
EICHER, Sgt.; TPR BISHOP; THE CARROLL COUNTY JAIL; MR.
HARDINGER, Warden; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLICE; STATE POLICE
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
February 17, 2017
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
February 24, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
David Michael Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.
Megan Green Anderson, Eric Matthew Rigatuso, ECCLESTON & WOLF,
PC, Hanover, Maryland for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
David Michael Montgomery appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Conmed, Inc., on
Montgomery’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
On appeal, we
Because Montgomery’s informal
disposition, Montgomery has forfeited appellate review of the
Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir.
Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved
in that brief.”).
Accordingly, we deny Montgomery’s motions for
appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?