Gregory Shawn Mercer v. Fairfax County CPS
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [999832467-3]; denying Motion to clarify [999832467-4]; denying Motion to compel [999766659-4]; denying Motion for other relief [999980957-2], denying Motion for other relief [999832467-2]; granting Motion for other relief [999925331-2]; granting Motion for leave to file [999901938-2], granting Motion for leave to file [999873780-2]; granting Motion to exceed length limitations [999832467-5] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00302-LO-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000008950]. Mailed to: Mercer. [16-1138]
Appeal: 16-1138
Doc: 48
Filed: 01/24/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1138
GREGORY SHAWN MERCER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAIRFAX COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, (FCCPS); FAIRFAX
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CODE COMPLIANCE, (FCDCC); ELIZABETH
PERRY, FCDCC Supervisor On 3/5/14; JACK BLAIR, FCDCC
Employee On 3/5/14; LATYCIA TANKS, FCDCC Employee On
3/5/14; KERRY S. ALLANDER, Virginia State Police Supervisor
On 6/9/06; KENNETH S. HOUTZ, Virginia State Trooper On
6/9/06; KATHLEEN H. MACKAY, Fairfax County Circuit Court
Judge On 6/22/07; ELIZABETH A. MCCLANANHAN, Court Of Appels
Of VA Judge On 2/18/09; LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, Supreme Court
Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; DONALD W. LEMON, Supreme
Court Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; LEROY F. MILLETTE,
Supreme Court Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; S. BERNARD
GOODWYN, Supreme Court Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; ALECIA
WASKLEWICZ, FCCPS Supervisor On 3/6/14; FAIRFAX COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, (FCBoS); SHARON BULOVA, Chairman Of
Fairfax County Board Of Supervisors,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ALICIA WASKLEWICS, FCCPS Supervisor On 3/6/14; TANYA E.
POWERS, FCCPS Social Worker On 3/6/14; WALTER S. FELTON,
JR., Court Of Appeals Of Virginia Judge On 2/18/09;
LARRY G. ELDER, Court Of Appeals Of Virginia Judge On
2/18/09; LEROY R. HASSELL, SR., Deceased Supreme Court Of
Virginia Judge, 2/9/11; BARBARA M. KEENAN, Supreme Court Of
Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; CYNTHIA D. KINSER, Supreme Court
Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09,
Defendants.
Appeal: 16-1138
Doc: 48
Filed: 01/24/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00302-LO-TCB)
Submitted:
January 6, 2017
Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.
DUNCAN,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
January 24, 2017
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Shawn Mercer, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Grossman Silverman,
Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia; Mark Rankin
Herring, Attorney General, Christian Arrowsmith Parrish, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Rhodes
Beahm Ritenour, Deputy Attorney General, Liza Shawn Simmons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-1138
Doc: 48
Filed: 01/24/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Shawn Mercer appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying his
motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and
find
Accordingly,
no
reversible
error.
reasons stated by the district court.
Child
Protective
Servs.,
No.
we
affirm
for
the
Mercer v. Fairfax Cnty.
1:15-cv-00302-LO-TCB
Aug. 25 & Dec. 17, 2015; Feb. 11, 2016).
(E.D.
Va.
The motions to compel,
for a subpoena, to clarify, and to direct a state judge to
verify a record’s existence are denied.
We grant the motions to
exceed the length limitations for the brief and to file amended
and
supplemental
dispense
with
contentions
are
informal
oral
reply
argument
adequately
briefs
because
presented
in
and
the
the
amendments.
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?