King Grant-Davis v. Supreme Court of SC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-04019-PMD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999801292]. Mailed to: King Grant-Davis. [16-1143]

Appeal: 16-1143

Doc: 5

Filed: 04/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1143

KING GRANT-DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA COURT OF
APPEALS; SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:15-cv-04019-PMD)

Submitted:

April 19, 2016

Decided:

April 22, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1143

Doc: 5

Filed: 04/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
King

Grant-Davis

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Grant-Davis v. Sup. Ct. of S.C., No. 2:15-cv-04019-PMD

(D.S.C. Jan. 14, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2