Patricia Flanigan v. Fayetteville State University

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00448-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999927950].. [16-1170, 16-1171]

Appeal: 16-1170

Doc: 22

Filed: 09/13/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1170

PATRICIA FLANIGAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.

No. 16-1171

PATRICIA GRIFFIETH FLANIGAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00448-FL; 5:15-cv-00527-FL)

Submitted:

August 24, 2016

Decided:

September 13, 2016

Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 16-1170

Doc: 22

Filed: 09/13/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirk J. Angel, ANGEL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Concord, North Carolina,
for Appellant.
Roy Cooper, North Carolina Attorney General,
Stephanie A. Brennan, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1170

Doc: 22

Filed: 09/13/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Patricia
order

Griffieth

granting

Flanigan

Fayetteville

appeals

State

the

district

University’s

court’s

motions

to

dismiss her harassment and retaliation claims, brought pursuant
to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42
U.S.C. §§ 2000e
parties’

2000e-17

arguments

Accordingly,
Flanigan v.

to

we

(2012).

and

discern

affirm

Fayetteville

the

We
no

have

reversible

district

State

Univ.,

court’s

Nos.

5:15-cv-00527-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2016).
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

considered

the

error.
judgment.

5:15-cv-00448-FL,
We dispense with

legal
before

contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3