In re: Julius Nesbitt

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999760705-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999769205-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999760710-2] Originating case number: 2:08-cr-01153-DCN-1,2:14-cv-04503-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999914295]. Mailed to: Julius Nesbitt. [16-1190]

Appeal: 16-1190

Doc: 9

Filed: 08/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1190

In Re: JULIUS NESBITT,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(2:08-cr-01153-DCN-1; 2:14-cv-04503-DCN)

Submitted:

August 1, 2016

Decided:

August 22, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julius Nesbitt, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1190

Doc: 9

Filed: 08/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Julius Nesbitt petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.

He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to act.

Our review of the district

court’s docket reveals that the district court recently took
significant action on Nesbitt’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
deny

the

mandamus

petition.

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2