Kenneth L. Sanford v. City of Franklin VA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999769136-2]; denying Motion for stay pending appeal [999779697-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00521-RAJ-RJK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999918776]. Mailed to: Kenneth L. Sanford 205 Harrison Street Franklin, VA 23851. [16-1204]

Appeal: 16-1204

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1204

KENNETH L. SANFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF FRANKLIN VA,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:15-cv-00521-RAJ-RJK)

Submitted:

August 25, 2016

Decided:

August 29, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth L. Sanford, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen Kailani Memmer,
Johneal M. White, GLENN, ROBINSON & CATHEY PLC, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1204

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kenneth

L.

Sanford

appeals

denying relief on his civil action.
and find no reversible error.

the

district

court’s

order

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, although we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.

Sanford v. City of Franklin, VA,

No. 2:15-cv-00521-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2016).
Sanford’s motion for stay pending appeal.

We deny

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2