Louise Biggers v. John Stumpf
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999777652-2]. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00682-JAG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999939662]. Mailed to: Louise Biggers. [16-1209]
Appeal: 16-1209
Doc: 15
Filed: 10/03/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1209
LOUISE BIGGERS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOHN G. STUMPF, doing business as Chairman, President and
CEO, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; SAMUEL I. WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00682-JAG)
Submitted:
June 30, 2016
Decided:
October 3, 2016
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louise Biggers, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank,
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Christy Lee Murphy,
Hunter Wilmer Sims, Jr., KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk,
Virginia; Benjamin Alexander Wills, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC,
Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1209
Doc: 15
Filed: 10/03/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Louise
Biggers
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing her complaint seeking to enjoin the foreclosure of
her home.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Biggers
Feb. 3, 2016).
v.
Stumpf,
No.
3:15-cv-00682-JAG
(E.D.
Va.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?