Louise Biggers v. John Stumpf

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999777652-2]. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00682-JAG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999939662]. Mailed to: Louise Biggers. [16-1209]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1209 Doc: 15 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1209 LOUISE BIGGERS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOHN G. STUMPF, doing business as Chairman, President and CEO, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; SAMUEL I. WHITE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00682-JAG) Submitted: June 30, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louise Biggers, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Christy Lee Murphy, Hunter Wilmer Sims, Jr., KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia; Benjamin Alexander Wills, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1209 Doc: 15 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Louise Biggers appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint seeking to enjoin the foreclosure of her home. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Biggers Feb. 3, 2016). v. Stumpf, No. 3:15-cv-00682-JAG (E.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?