Housing Authority of Baltimore v. Erica White
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999763922-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03568-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999895785]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-1211]
Appeal: 16-1211
Doc: 12
Filed: 07/25/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1211
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF BALTIMORE CITY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERICA S. WHITE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:15-cv-03568-JFM)
Submitted:
July 21, 2016
Decided:
July 25, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erica S. White, Appellant Pro Se.
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Carrie
Blackburn
Riley,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1211
Doc: 12
Filed: 07/25/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Erica
remanding
S.
White
this
appeals
removed
the
action
to
district
state
court’s
court
for
orders
lack
jurisdiction and denying the motion for reconsideration.
order
remanding
a
case
to
state
reviewable on appeal or otherwise.
The
Supreme
Court
has
limited
court
is
generally
of
An
not
28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012).
the
scope
of
§
1447(d),
prohibiting appellate review of remand orders based on a defect
in the removal procedure or lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706, 711-12 (1996);
see 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012).
Here, remand was based on lack
of subject matter jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?