Andre Whitfield v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for summary disposition (Local Rule 27(f)) [999790900-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999773845-2]. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00441-HEH-RCY. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999828628]. Mailed to: Andre Whitfield. [16-1232]

Appeal: 16-1232

Doc: 11

Filed: 05/20/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1232

ANDRE D. WHITFIELD,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:15-cv-00441-HEH-RCY)

Submitted:

May 16, 2016

Decided:

May 20, 2016

Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre D. Whitfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1232

Doc: 11

Filed: 05/20/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Andre

D.

Whitfield,

a

federal

prisoner,

appeals

the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012)

petition.

reversible

error.

We

have

reviewed

Accordingly,

the

although

record
we

and

grant

find

no

leave

to

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the

district

court.

Whitfield

v.

United

3:15-cv-00441-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2016).

States,

No.

We deny the

motion for summary disposition and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2