Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Carolyn Colvin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999788024-2]. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00046-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999939729]. Mailed to: Lawrence Wilder. [16-1241]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1241 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1241 LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James E. Gates, Magistrate Judge. (7:15-cv-00046-D) Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1241 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his request for a hearing and for appointment of counsel in his civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Wilder seeks Corp., to 337 appeal U.S. is 541, 545-46 neither a (1949). final appealable interlocutory or collateral order. The order order nor an Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?