Jerry A. Hurst v. Guy Harbert
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00033-GEC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999914269]. Mailed to: Jerry A. Hurst Apartment 6 445 North Water Street Woodstock, VA 22664. [16-1242]
Appeal: 16-1242
Doc: 11
Filed: 08/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1242
JERRY A. HURST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GUY HARBERT, in their individual and official capacities;
MAXWELL WIEGARD, in their individual and official capacities;
MARTY HARBIN, in their individual and official capacities;
COLIN SHALK, in their individual and official capacities;
NICHOLAS SKILES, in their individual and official capacities;
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00033-GEC)
Submitted:
August 18, 2016
Decided:
August 22, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1242
Doc: 11
Filed: 08/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry A. Hurst appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his complaint in
which he sought to raise claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), the
Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2722, 2724 (2012),
and various state laws.
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Hurst v. Harbert, No. 5:15-cv-00033-GEC
(W.D. Va. filed Feb. 12, 2016; entered Feb. 16, 2016).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?