Lawrence Wilder v. Wilmington NC Police Dept
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999788030-2] Originating case number: 7:09-cv-00036-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999895708]. Mailed to: L. Wilder, Sr.. [16-1255]
Appeal: 16-1255
Doc: 10
Filed: 07/25/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1255
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILMINGTON
NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF RALPH
EVANGELOUS, Wilmington North Carolina Police Department; WANDA
COPLEY, County Attorney; BENJAMIN DAVID, District County Office;
UNKNOWN, Wilmington North Carolina Police Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00036-BO)
Submitted:
July 21, 2016
Decided:
July 25, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1255
Doc: 10
Filed: 07/25/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order
denying
his
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
60(b)
motion.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for
the
reasons
Wilmington
N.C.
stated
Police
Feb. 22, 2016).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
by
the
Dep’t,
district
No.
court.
Wilder
7:09-cv-00036-BO
v.
(E.D.N.C.
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?