Lawrence Wilder v. Wilmington NC Police Dept

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999788030-2] Originating case number: 7:09-cv-00036-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999895708]. Mailed to: L. Wilder, Sr.. [16-1255]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1255 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/25/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1255 LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF RALPH EVANGELOUS, Wilmington North Carolina Police Department; WANDA COPLEY, County Attorney; BENJAMIN DAVID, District County Office; UNKNOWN, Wilmington North Carolina Police Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00036-BO) Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 25, 2016 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1255 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/25/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons Wilmington N.C. stated Police Feb. 22, 2016). facts and materials legal before by the Dep’t, district No. court. Wilder 7:09-cv-00036-BO v. (E.D.N.C. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?