Adrian Pugh v. Montgomery Co. Board of Edu

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999772279-2]. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02862-DKC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999895742]. Mailed to: Adrian Pugh. [16-1260]

Appeal: 16-1260

Doc: 20

Filed: 07/25/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1260

ADRIAN D. PUGH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:13-cv-02862-DKC)

Submitted:

July 21, 2016

Decided:

July 25, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian D. Pugh, Appellant Pro Se.
Edward B. Lattner, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1260

Doc: 20

Filed: 07/25/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Adrian

D.

granting

the

judgment

motion

pursuant

to

Pugh

appeals

Montgomery
on

Title

County

her
VII

the

race

of

district

Board

of

Civil

judgment

Education’s

discrimination

the

court’s

Rights

claims,
Act

of

summary
brought
1964,

as

amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp.
2015).

We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, although we grant Pugh’s application to

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.

See Pugh v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Educ.,

No. 8:13-cv-02862-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2016).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2