Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999788052-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999788044-2] Originating case number: 1:97-cv-01969-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999895697]. Mailed to: L. Wilder, Sr. [16-1267]

Appeal: 16-1267

Doc: 12

Filed: 07/25/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1267

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:97-cv-01969-WDQ)

Submitted:

July 21, 2016

Decided:

July 25, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Michael N.
Russo, Jr., COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, PA, Annapolis,
Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1267

Doc: 12

Filed: 07/25/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order

denying

his

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

60(b)

motion.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

See Aikens v.

Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (providing standard).
Accordingly,

although

pauperis, we affirm.
is denied.
legal
before

grant

leave

to

proceed

in

forma

Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

we

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2