In re: Michael Lawrence Eisner

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999792614-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999777624-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cr-00167-GBL-1,1:15-cv-00892-GBL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999939761]. Mailed to: Michael Lawrence Eisner UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY LEWISBURG SATELLITE CAMP P. O. Box 2000 Lewisburg, PA 17837-0000. [16-1287]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1287 Doc: 10 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1287 In re: MICHAEL LAWRENCE EISNER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:14-cr-00167-GBL-1; 1:15-cv-00892-GBL) Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Lawrence Eisner, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1287 Doc: 10 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Lawrence Eisner petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. record does not reveal undue delay in We find the present the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?