In re: Michael Lawrence Eisner
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999792614-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999777624-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cr-00167-GBL-1,1:15-cv-00892-GBL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999939761]. Mailed to: Michael Lawrence Eisner UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY LEWISBURG SATELLITE CAMP P. O. Box 2000 Lewisburg, PA 17837-0000. [16-1287]
Appeal: 16-1287
Doc: 10
Filed: 10/03/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1287
In re: MICHAEL LAWRENCE EISNER,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:14-cr-00167-GBL-1;
1:15-cv-00892-GBL)
Submitted:
September 29, 2016
Decided:
October 3, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Lawrence Eisner, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1287
Doc: 10
Filed: 10/03/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Lawrence Eisner petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012) motion.
He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act.
record
does
not
reveal
undue
delay
in
We find the present
the
district
court.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
deny
the
mandamus
petition.
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?