Iana Rata v. Loretta Lynch
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A205-105-221,A205-105-222 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-1292]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
IANA RATA; ARA ARARAT TIRATSVYAN,
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
December 16, 2016
January 24, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY,
Assistant Attorney General, Nancy Friedman, Senior
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
husband, derivative beneficiary Ara A. Tiratsvyan, petition for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
We have reviewed the administrative record and Rata’s
claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion
accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board.
See In re Rata (B.I.A. Feb. 22, 2016).
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?