Tonya Chapman v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00441-TMC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999914285]. Mailed to: Tonya Chapman. [16-1299]
Appeal: 16-1299
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1299
TONYA R. CHAPMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY; ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY
OF SPARTANBURG, SC; SAMUEL BO HUFFLING, Regional Manager;
ROBERT CARMEN, Manager; LAUREN PACE, Assistant Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
Timothy M. Cain, District
Judge. (7:15-cv-00441-TMC)
Submitted:
August 18, 2016
Decided:
August 22, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tonya R. Chapman, Appellant Pro Se.
Sarah Day Hurley, TURNER,
PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, Carmelo
Barone Sammataro, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1299
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tonya
accepting
granting
R.
the
Chapman
appeals
recommendation
Defendants
summary
§ 1981 (2012) action.
reversible error.
the
of
the
judgment
district
court’s
magistrate
in
Chapman’s
order
judge
42
and
U.S.C.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
See Chapman v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Co., No. 7:15-cv-00441-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2016).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?