Tonya Chapman v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00441-TMC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999914285]. Mailed to: Tonya Chapman. [16-1299]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1299 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1299 TONYA R. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY; ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY OF SPARTANBURG, SC; SAMUEL BO HUFFLING, Regional Manager; ROBERT CARMEN, Manager; LAUREN PACE, Assistant Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (7:15-cv-00441-TMC) Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 22, 2016 Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tonya R. Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah Day Hurley, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, Carmelo Barone Sammataro, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1299 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tonya accepting granting R. the Chapman appeals recommendation Defendants summary § 1981 (2012) action. reversible error. the of the judgment district court’s magistrate in Chapman’s order judge 42 and U.S.C. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chapman v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., No. 7:15-cv-00441-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?