In Re: Michael Harri


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999792562-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999780002-2] Originating case number: 3:12-cr-00170-HEH-RCY-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999901034]. Mailed to: Michael Harris. [16-1303]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1303 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1303 In re: MICHAEL F. HARRIS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: (3:12-cr-00170-HEH-RCY-1) July 28, 2016 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and August 1, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Harris, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1303 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael F. Harris petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order judgment instructing on his 28 the U.S.C. district § 2255 court (2012) Government’s delay in filing its answer. to grant motion summary due to the Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court entered an order denying the § 2255 motion on May 10, 2016, and Harris has appealed that order. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Harris’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We oral dispense contentions with are argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?