In Re: Michael Harri
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999792562-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999780002-2] Originating case number: 3:12-cr-00170-HEH-RCY-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999901034]. Mailed to: Michael Harris. [16-1303]
Appeal: 16-1303
Doc: 9
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1303
In re: MICHAEL F. HARRIS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted:
(3:12-cr-00170-HEH-RCY-1)
July 28, 2016
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
August 1, 2016
DAVIS,
Senior
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael F. Harris, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1303
Doc: 9
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael F. Harris petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking
an
order
judgment
instructing
on
his
28
the
U.S.C.
district
§ 2255
court
(2012)
Government’s delay in filing its answer.
to
grant
motion
summary
due
to
the
Our review of the
district court’s docket reveals that the district court entered
an order denying the § 2255 motion on May 10, 2016, and Harris
has
appealed
that
order.
Accordingly,
because
the
district
court has recently decided Harris’ case, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
We
oral
dispense
contentions
with
are
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?