Edar Rogler v. Alexandra Foto

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999782214-2]. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00228-JKB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999918800]. [16-1323]

Appeal: 16-1323

Doc: 19

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1323

EDAR Y. ROGLER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ALEXANDRA M. FOTOS, in her personal capacity, in
landlord capacity, in her premise owner capacity,
Christine Fotos, d/b/a Alexandra M. Fotos; NEIL HARPE,

her
for

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:14-cv-00228-JKB)

Submitted:

August 25, 2016

Decided:

August 29, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edar Y. Rogler, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Marie McGinley, DECARO,
DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1323

Doc: 19

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Edar

Y.

Rogler

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders

dismissing her complaint and awarding attorney’s fees and costs
to Defendants and denying her motion to reconsider the order.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Fotos,

No.

1:14-cv-00228-JKB

(D.

Md.

2015; Jan. 21, 2016; Feb. 26, 2016).

Dec.

9,

2014;

Rogler v.
Oct.

22,

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2