Lorenda McCoy v. Target Corporation

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999782306-2]. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03437-GLR. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999918668]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-1326]

Appeal: 16-1326

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1326

LORENDA MCCOY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03437-GLR)

Submitted:

August 25, 2016

Decided:

August 29, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenda McCoy, Appellant Pro Se.
Daniel R. Lanier, Lynn
Christina Schlie, MILES & STOCKBRIGE, PC, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1326

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lorenda McCoy appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her civil complaint.
find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and

Accordingly, although we grant leave

to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.

McCoy v. Target Corp., No. 1:14-cv-

03437-GLR (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2