Sherrie Terry v. Carolyn Colvin


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-04641-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000021205].. [16-1332]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1332 Doc: 23 Filed: 02/10/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1332 SHERRIE J. TERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (8:14-cv-04641-MGL) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: February 10, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. Leeds Barroll, J. LEEDS BARROLL LAW OFFICE, Columbia, South Carolina; Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., FINKEL LAW FIRM, LLC, North Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Nora Koch, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Charles Kawas, Acting Supervisory Attorney, Jillian Quick, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Marshall Prince, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1332 Doc: 23 Filed: 02/10/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Sherrie J. Terry appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm. Terry v. Colvin, No. 8:14-cv- 04641-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?