Starsha Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to strike [999797582-2] in 16-1352; denying Motion to seal [999804209-2] in 16-1352 Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03077-PWG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999927905]. [16-1352, 16-1354]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1352 Doc: 26 Filed: 09/13/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1352 STARSHA SEWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, in care of Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC; INSURANCE COMPANY; MILESTONE TITLE, LLC, Chicago CHICAGO Title TITLE Chicago Title Defendants - Appellees. No. 16-1354 STARSHA SEWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, in care Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC, of Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:15-cv-03077-PWG; 8:15-cv-03392-PWG) Submitted: September 9, 2016 Decided: September 13, 2016 Appeal: 16-1352 Doc: 26 Filed: 09/13/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael William Tompkins, FIDELITY NATIONAL LAW GROUP, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-1352 Doc: 26 Filed: 09/13/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Starsha dismissing Sewell these appeals civil the actions and denying Sewell v. Fidelity and Nat’l find for Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. record motions reversible error. district the her orders We the reviewed court’s reconsideration. by have district no Financial, Inc., Nos. 8:15-cv-03077-PWG; 8:15-cv-03392-PWG (D. Md. Oct. 23 & Nov. 19, 2015; Jan. 5, Feb. 24, Mar. 22 & Mar. 24, 2016). The motions are to denied. legal before strike the supplemental appendix and to seal We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?