In re: Gerald Porter

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999787481-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999830182-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03584-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999939790].. [16-1366]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1366 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1366 In re: GERALD PORTER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: September 29, 2016 (8:15-cv-03584-MGL) Decided: October 3, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald Porter, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1366 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gerald Porter petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order from relief on this court Porter’s 28 directing U.S.C. the § district 2241 court (2012) to grant petition. We conclude that Porter is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Finally, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Porter is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?