In re: Gerald Porter
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999787481-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999830182-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03584-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999939790].. [16-1366]
Appeal: 16-1366
Doc: 11
Filed: 10/03/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1366
In re:
GERALD PORTER,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted:
September 29, 2016
(8:15-cv-03584-MGL)
Decided:
October 3, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Porter, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1366
Doc: 11
Filed: 10/03/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Porter petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an
order from
relief
on
this
court
Porter’s
28
directing
U.S.C.
the
§
district
2241
court
(2012)
to
grant
petition.
We
conclude that Porter is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only
in extraordinary circumstances.
Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426
U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509,
516-17 (4th Cir. 2003).
Further, mandamus relief is available
only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought.
In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.
1988).
Finally, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for
appeal.
In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th
Cir. 2007).
The relief sought by Porter is not available by way of
mandamus.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?