William Davis, Jr. v. Town of Cary North Carolina
Filing
OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 5:08-cv-00176-BO Copies to all parties and the district court. Mailed to: William Scott Davis II. [999900905] [16-1377, 16-1378, 16-1380, 16-1381]
Appeal: 16-1377
Doc: 19
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 1 of 4
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1377
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA; HAROLD WEINBRECHT, Mayor; STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA; WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; PATTI
HEAD; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES;
ALBERT SINGER, Wake County North Carolina County Attorney;
TRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES; MILES WRIGHT, Interim CEO,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 16-1378
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCOTT L. WILKINSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 16-1380
WAKE COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
Appeal: 16-1377
Doc: 19
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 2 of 4
v.
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 16-1381
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, and (a minor) J.F.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE MONICA M. BOUSMAN, individually and as Juvenile State
Court Judge North Carolina, Wake County; ERICK CHASSE
CHASSE, individually and as a Juvenile State Court Judge,
North Carolina, Wake County; JAMES FULLWOOD, individually
and a Juvenile State Court Judge, North Carolina, Wake
County; ROBERT B. RADAR, individually and as a Juvenile
State Court Judge, North Carolina, Wake County 10th Judicial
District,
Chief
District
Judge;
MARGARET
EAGLES,
individually and a Juvenile of the State of North Carolina,
10th Judicial District; BEVERLY PURDUE, individually and as
Governor of the State of North Carolina; JOHN C. MARTIN,
individually and a Chief Judge of the North Carolina Court
of Appeals and Chief of the N. C. Judicial Standards
Commission,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge.
(5:08-cv-00176-BO; 5:11-cv-00031-BO; 5:12-cv00413-BO; 5:14-cv-00006-BO)
Submitted:
July 28, 2016
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
2
Judges,
and
August 1, 2016
DAVIS,
Senior
Appeal: 16-1377
Doc: 19
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 3 of 4
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3
Appeal: 16-1377
Doc: 19
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 4 of 4
PER CURIAM:
William
Scott
Davis,
Jr.,
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
court’s order denying his motion to set aside the judgments in
four closed civil cases.
Davis argued in his notice of appeal,
and the record suggests, that he did not timely receive notice
of the entry of the district court’s order.
4(a)(6)(A).
See Fed. R. App. P.
Because the 30-day appeal period is jurisdictional,
Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007), we remand the case
for
the
limited
purpose
of
allowing
the
district
court
to
determine whether to reopen the time to file an appeal, pursuant
to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
REMANDED
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?