Sylvia Jenkins v. Dollar Tree Corporation
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00047-MSD-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999914232]. Mailed to: S Jenkins. [16-1382]
Appeal: 16-1382
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1382
SYLVIA JENKINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DOLLAR TREE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:16-cv-00047-MSD-DEM)
Submitted:
August 18, 2016
Decided:
August 22, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sylvia Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1382
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sylvia Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing
her
civil
complaint.
This
court
may
exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan
Corp.,
337
U.S.
541,
545-47
(1949).
Because
the
deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied
through the filing of an amended complaint averring sufficient
facts in support of Jenkins’ claim, we conclude that the order
Jenkins
seeks
to
appeal
is
neither
a
final
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
order
nor
an
Goode v. Cent.
Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015);
Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d
1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly,
jurisdiction.
we
dismiss
the
appeal
for
lack
of
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?