Robert Rodgers v. Preferred Carolinas Realty


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00764-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015739].. [16-1387]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1387 Doc: 28 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1387 ROBERT V. RODGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC.; JAMES E. ALLEN, JR.; JIM ALLEN GROUP, INC.; HARRY JAMES THORPE, Defendants – Appellees, and RANDALL EICHORN; LISA EICHORN; W. SIDNEY ALDRIDGE; NICHOLLS & CRAMPTON, PA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00764-FL) Submitted: January 27, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. R. Hayes Hofler, III, HAYES HOFLER, PA, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Bryan T. Simpson, Natalia K. Isenberg, TEAGUE, CAMPBELL, DENNIS & GORHAM, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Appeal: 16-1387 Doc: 28 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-1387 Doc: 28 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Robert V. Rodgers appeals from the district court’s order sua sponte granting reconsideration of a prior order and entering summary judgment in favor of the Defendants as to all of Rodgers’ claims. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, including the district court’s opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re Rodgers (Rodgers v. Preferred Carolinas Realty, Inc.), No. 5:13-cv-00764-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2016). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?