Robert Rodgers v. Preferred Carolinas Realty

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00764-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015739].. [16-1387]

Appeal: 16-1387

Doc: 28

Filed: 02/02/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1387

ROBERT V. RODGERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC.; JAMES E. ALLEN, JR.; JIM
ALLEN GROUP, INC.; HARRY JAMES THORPE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
RANDALL EICHORN; LISA EICHORN; W. SIDNEY ALDRIDGE; NICHOLLS
& CRAMPTON, PA,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00764-FL)

Submitted:

January 27, 2017

Decided:

February 2, 2017

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

R. Hayes Hofler, III, HAYES HOFLER, PA, Durham, North Carolina,
for Appellant.
Bryan T. Simpson, Natalia K. Isenberg, TEAGUE,
CAMPBELL, DENNIS & GORHAM, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Appeal: 16-1387

Doc: 28

Filed: 02/02/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1387

Doc: 28

Filed: 02/02/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Robert V. Rodgers appeals from the district court’s order
sua

sponte

granting

reconsideration

of

a

prior

order

and

entering summary judgment in favor of the Defendants as to all
of Rodgers’ claims.

We have reviewed the record included on

appeal, including the district court’s opinions, and find no
reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

In re Rodgers (Rodgers v. Preferred

Carolinas Realty, Inc.), No. 5:13-cv-00764-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 8,
2016).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

3