Hoai Thanh v. Hien Ngo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-01992-PJM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000057054]. Mailed to: Merrill Cohen & Jeanne Crouse. [16-1391, 16-1397]

Appeal: 16-1391

Doc: 37

Filed: 04/06/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1391

HOAI THANH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HIEN T. NGO,
Defendant - Appellee.

No. 16-1397

HOAI THANH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HIEN T. NGO,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-01992-PJM; 8:15-cv-03441-PJM)

Submitted: February 24, 2017

Decided: April 6, 2017

Appeal: 16-1391

Doc: 37

Filed: 04/06/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Before AGEE, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Laurence A. Elgin, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Joseph Daniel Gallagher, GILL,
SIPPEL & GALLAGHER, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1391

Doc: 37

Filed: 04/06/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Hoai Thanh appeals the district court’s orders: (1)
denying his motions to reconsider a prior order granting summary judgment in favor of
the Defendant in the underlying defamation action, and (2) denying his motions to
reconsider the dismissal of his independent complaint asserting fraud upon the court, Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(d). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the district
court’s opinions, and have found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hoai Thanh v. Hien Ngo, Nos. 8:11-cv-01992-PJM;
8:15-cv-03441-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2016; May 17, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3