Charles Treece v. Carolyn Colvin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01077-NCT-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999954407]. Mailed to: Charles A. Treece P. O. Box 5132 Concord, NC 28027. [16-1394]

Appeal: 16-1394

Doc: 13

Filed: 10/25/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1394

CHARLES A. TREECE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01077-NCT-LPA)

Submitted:

September 30, 2016

Decided:

October 25, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles A. Treece, Appellant Pro Se.
Maija DiDomenico,
Assistant Regional Counsel, Antonia Maria Pfeffer, Special
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
SOCIAL
SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1394

Doc: 13

Filed: 10/25/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Charles
adopting

A.

Commissioner’s

appeals

magistrate

the

Treece

judge’s

suspension

of

the

district

court’s

recommendation
Treece’s

to

old-age

order

affirm

the

insurance

benefits.

Our review of the Commissioner’s determination is

limited

evaluating

to

whether

the

findings

are

supported

by

substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied.
See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2012); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d
650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005).
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record and
discern

no

reversible

error.

district court’s judgment.
NCT-LPA

(M.D.N.C.

Mar.

Accordingly,

we

affirm

the

Treece v. Colvin, No. 1:14-cv-01077-

25,

2016).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2