Kevin Klik v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:15-cv-00002-NKM-JCH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999945441] [16-1395]

Appeal: 16-1395

Doc: 28

Filed: 10/12/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1395

KEVIN C. KLIK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VERIZON VIRGINIA, INC., a/k/a VERIZON VA; VERIZON SERVICES
CORP.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.
Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (6:15-cv-00002-NKM-JCH)

Submitted:

September 29, 2016

Decided:

October 12, 2016

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin E. Williams, MEL WILLIAMS PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellant.
Betty S.W. Graumlich, REED SMITH LLP, Richmond,
Virginia; Kim M. Watterson, REED SMITH LLP, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1395

Doc: 28

Filed: 10/12/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kevin C. Klik appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants’ summary judgment motion and denying Klik’s summary
judgment

motion

on

Klik’s

disability

discrimination

claims,

brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2012).
and

find

no

reversible

district court’s order.

error.

We have reviewed the record
Accordingly,

we

affirm

the

See Klik v. Verizon Va., Inc., No.

6:15-cv-00002-NKM-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2016).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2