Dontronn Goode v. US


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999798712-2]. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00712-HEH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999871571]. Mailed to: Dontronn Goode. [16-1402]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1402 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1402 DONTRONN GOODE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00712-HEH) Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dontronn Goode, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Harker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1402 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dontronn dismissing Goode without appeals prejudice the his statutes for lack of standing. find no reversible error. district suit court’s challenging order certain We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 00712-HEH (E.D. Va. Mar. Goode v. United States, No. 3:15-cv25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?