Dontronn Goode v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999798712-2]. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00712-HEH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999871571]. Mailed to: Dontronn Goode. [16-1402]
Appeal: 16-1402
Doc: 9
Filed: 06/28/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1402
DONTRONN GOODE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:15-cv-00712-HEH)
Submitted:
June 23, 2016
Decided:
June 28, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dontronn Goode, Appellant Pro Se.
Margaret Harker, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1402
Doc: 9
Filed: 06/28/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dontronn
dismissing
Goode
without
appeals
prejudice
the
his
statutes for lack of standing.
find no reversible error.
district
suit
court’s
challenging
order
certain
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court.
00712-HEH
(E.D.
Va.
Mar.
Goode v. United States, No. 3:15-cv25,
2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?