Renee McCray v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03445-GLR,13-26131,13-00710 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999983648]. Mailed to: Renee McCray. [16-1415]

Appeal: 16-1415

Doc: 15

Filed: 12/09/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1415

RENEE LOUISE MCCRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03445-GLR; 13-26131; 13-00710)

Submitted:

October 28, 2016

Decided:

December 9, 2016

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Renee Louise McCray, Appellant Pro Se.
Douglas Brooks Riley, TREANOR, POPE &
Maryland, for Appellee.

Michael S. Barranco,
HUGHES, PA, Towson,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1415

Doc: 15

Filed: 12/09/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Renee Louise McCray appeals the district court’s orders:
(1) adopting the bankruptcy court’s proposed findings of fact
and

conclusions

action,

and

(2) denying her postjudgment motions for reconsideration.

We

have

reviewed

of

law

the

and

record

dismissing

and

find

her

no

civil

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

McCray v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:14-cv-03445-GLR;

13-26131; 13-00710 (D. Md. Oct. 14, 2015; Mar. 30, 2016; Apr. 8,
2016).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2