Christine F. Radeline v. Martin J. Gruenberg


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00957-CMH-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999988397].. [16-1416]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1416 Doc: 29 Filed: 12/16/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1416 CHRISTINE F. RADELINE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARTIN Corp., J. GRUENBERG, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00957-CMH-JFA) Submitted: November 30, 2016 Before GREGORY, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: and MOTZ and December 16, 2016 TRAXLER, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ellen K. Renaud, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Colleen J. Boles, Assistant General Counsel, Kathryn R. Norcross, Senior Counsel, Michelle Ognibene, Counsel, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1416 Doc: 29 Filed: 12/16/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Christine F. Radeline appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of her employer in Radeline’s civil action alleging sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, as amended. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. No. 1:15-cv-00957-CMH-JFA entered Mar. 29, 2016). (E.D. Va. Radeline v. Gruenberg, filed Mar. 28, 2016 & We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?