Doreen Shing v. MD Developmental Disabilitie
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to submit on the briefs (Local Rule 34(e)) [999867460-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00683-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Shing. [16-1467]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
MD DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
January 9, 2017
Before DIAZ and
January 19, 2017
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doreen Shing, Appellant Pro Se.
William G. Dunlap, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint without
prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
Because it is possible that the Shings could cure the defects in
their complaint through amendment, the order they seek to appeal
See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 807
F.3d 619, 623-25 (4th Cir. 2015).
Accordingly, we deny as moot
Appellees’ motion to submit on the briefs, dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction, and remand the case to the district
court with instructions to allow the Shings to file an amended
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?