Judith Halpern v. SSA
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-02538-TDC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: J Halpern. [16-1473]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
February 9, 2017
February 17, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judith Halpern, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Blair Prevas, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
Judith Halpern appeals the district court’s order adopting
Commissioner’s denial of Halpern’s applications for disability
insurance benefits and supplemental security income.
outset, we limit our review to the issues raised in Halpern’s
Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th
determination is limited to evaluating whether the correct law
Bird v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 699
F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir. 2012).
“Substantial evidence means such
relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate
to support a conclusion.”
Hancock v. Astrue, 667 F.3d 470, 472
Radford v. Colvin, 734 F.3d 288, 296 (4th Cir. 2013) (internal
quotation marks omitted).
record and the parties’ submissions and discern no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Halpern v. SSA, No. 8:14-cv-02538-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 21, 2016).
Pg: 3 of 3
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?