Clifton Webb v. University of North Carolina


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00268-LCB-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999997508].. [16-1481]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1481 Doc: 26 Filed: 01/04/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1481 CLIFTON LEON WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, a body politic and corporate institution of the State of North Carolina; GENA J. CARTER, sued in her individual and official capacities; DARIUS DIXON, Individually; BEN TRIPLETT, Individually, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00268-LCB-JEP) Submitted: November 30, 2016 Decided: January 4, 2017 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. Heydt Philbeck, Sr., BAILEY & DIXON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General of North Carolina, Joseph A. Newsome, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1481 Doc: 26 Filed: 01/04/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Clifton Leon Webb appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Webb’s complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2012), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016) (Title VII). Webb challenges on appeal only the district court’s dismissal of his Title VII retaliation claim. We have arguments and find no reversible error. considered Webb’s Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Webb v. Univ. of N.C., No. 1:15-cv-00268-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2016). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?