Clifton Webb v. University of North Carolina

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00268-LCB-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999997508].. [16-1481]

Appeal: 16-1481

Doc: 26

Filed: 01/04/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1481

CLIFTON LEON WEBB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, a body
politic and corporate institution of the State of North
Carolina; GENA J. CARTER, sued in her individual and
official
capacities;
DARIUS
DIXON,
Individually;
BEN
TRIPLETT, Individually,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
Loretta C. Biggs,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00268-LCB-JEP)

Submitted:

November 30, 2016

Decided:

January 4, 2017

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

J. Heydt Philbeck, Sr., BAILEY & DIXON, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General of North
Carolina,
Joseph
A.
Newsome,
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1481

Doc: 26

Filed: 01/04/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Clifton

Leon

Webb

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Webb’s complaint alleging
claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2012), and Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e
to

2000e-17

(West

2008

&

Supp.

2016)

(Title

VII).

Webb

challenges on appeal only the district court’s dismissal of his
Title

VII

retaliation

claim.

We

have

arguments and find no reversible error.

considered

Webb’s

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

See Webb v. Univ.

of N.C., No. 1:15-cv-00268-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2016).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2