Claudia Guevara-Carranza v. Loretta Lynch
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A205-374-399,A205-374-400 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000044223].. [16-1487]
Appeal: 16-1487
Doc: 34
Filed: 03/17/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1487
CLAUDIA JASMIN GUEVARA-CARRANZA; C.M.M.,
Petitioners,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
February 28, 2017
Decided:
March 17, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioners.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Jessica E. Burns, Senior Litigation
Counsel, Maarja T. Luhtaru, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1487
Doc: 34
Filed: 03/17/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Claudia
Jasmin
Guevara-Carranza
and
her
minor
daughter,
C.M.M., natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review
of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing
their appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of GuevaraCarranza’s
requests
protection
under
for
the
asylum,
withholding
Convention
Against
of
removal,
Torture.
We
and
have
thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of their
merits hearing before the immigration court and all supporting
evidence.
We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a
ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see
8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence
supports the Board’s decision.
See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502
U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board. In re Guevara-Carranza (B.I.A. Apr. 1, 2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?