Syed Kazmi v. Samuel White
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00178-LMB-IDD,15-11836-RGM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999962511]. Mailed to: Afshan Kazmi. [16-1512]
Appeal: 16-1512
Doc: 28
Filed: 11/04/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1512
AFSHAN SYED KAZMI, as personal representative of the Estate
of Syed Aftab Kazmi,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Creditor – Appellee,
and
JUDY A. ROBBINS, United State Trustee,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00178-LMB-IDD; 15-11836-RGM)
Submitted:
October 26, 2016
Decided:
November 4, 2016
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Afshan Syed Kazmi, Appellant Pro Se.
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,
Robert Joseph Schneider, Jr., UNITED
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Bradley David Jones,
Alexandria, Virginia;
STATES DEPARTMENT OF
Appeal: 16-1512
Doc: 28
Filed: 11/04/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-1512
Doc: 28
Filed: 11/04/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Afshan Syed Kazmi, as personal representative of the Estate
of
Syed
Aftab
Kazmi,
appeals
her
appeal
from
dismissing
the
the
bankruptcy
the
court’s
court’s
underlying
order
ruling
dismissing,
without
proceeding.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error.
prejudice,
district
bankruptcy
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Kazmi v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Nos. 1:16-cv-
00178-LMB-IDD;
15-11836-RGM
dispense
oral
with
contentions
are
(E.D.
argument
adequately
Va.
because
presented
in
Apr.
the
the
5,
2016).
We
facts
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?