Syed Kazmi v. Samuel White

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00178-LMB-IDD,15-11836-RGM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999962511]. Mailed to: Afshan Kazmi. [16-1512]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1512 Doc: 28 Filed: 11/04/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1512 AFSHAN SYED KAZMI, as personal representative of the Estate of Syed Aftab Kazmi, Debtor - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Creditor – Appellee, and JUDY A. ROBBINS, United State Trustee, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00178-LMB-IDD; 15-11836-RGM) Submitted: October 26, 2016 Decided: November 4, 2016 Before WYNN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Afshan Syed Kazmi, Appellant Pro Se. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Robert Joseph Schneider, Jr., UNITED JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Bradley David Jones, Alexandria, Virginia; STATES DEPARTMENT OF Appeal: 16-1512 Doc: 28 Filed: 11/04/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-1512 Doc: 28 Filed: 11/04/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Afshan Syed Kazmi, as personal representative of the Estate of Syed Aftab Kazmi, appeals her appeal from dismissing the the bankruptcy the court’s court’s underlying order ruling dismissing, without proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. prejudice, district bankruptcy Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kazmi v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Nos. 1:16-cv- 00178-LMB-IDD; 15-11836-RGM dispense oral with contentions are (E.D. argument adequately Va. because presented in Apr. the the 5, 2016). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?