Janice Jackson v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-03155-TDC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999901108]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-1536]
Appeal: 16-1536
Doc: 16
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1536
JANICE JACKSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY; BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
COMPANY (BB&T) REGISTERED AGENT; SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.;
WILLIAM ADAM WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-03155-TDC)
Submitted:
July 28, 2016
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
August 1, 2016
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janice Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Harvey Hillman,
SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1536
Doc: 16
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Janice Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying
her third amended motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60(b) of the district court’s order denying her request for a
preliminary injunction regarding her eviction.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Jackson v. Branch
Banking & Tr. Co., No. 8:14-cv-03155-TDC (D. Md. Apr. 13, 2016).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?