Gary Mullen v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999853611-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-02640-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999948219]. Mailed to: Gary Mullen. [16-1542]
Appeal: 16-1542
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/17/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1542
GARY ALEXANDER MULLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Structured
Asset
Securities
Corporation
Mortgage
Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2006-AM1 Its Successors or Assigns;
AAMES FUNDING CORPORATION, d/b/a Aames Home Loan; DOES 1 100, Inclusive,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:15-cv-02640-JFM)
Submitted:
October 13, 2016
Decided:
October 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Alexander Mullen, Appellant Pro Se.
Michael S. Barranco,
Justin E. Fine, TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, PA, Towson, Maryland,
for Appellee U.S. Bank National Association.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1542
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/17/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Gary
Alexander
Mullen
appeals
from
the
district
court’s
order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as
barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Assoc.,
dispense
No.
1:15-cv-02640-JFM
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
(D.
Mullen v. U.S. Bank Nat’l
Md.
because
presented
in
Feb.
the
the
8,
2016).
We
facts
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?