Gary Mullen v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999853611-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-02640-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999948219]. Mailed to: Gary Mullen. [16-1542]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1542 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/17/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1542 GARY ALEXANDER MULLEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AM1 Its Successors or Assigns; AAMES FUNDING CORPORATION, d/b/a Aames Home Loan; DOES 1 100, Inclusive, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-02640-JFM) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Alexander Mullen, Appellant Pro Se. Michael S. Barranco, Justin E. Fine, TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, PA, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee U.S. Bank National Association. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1542 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/17/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gary Alexander Mullen appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Assoc., dispense No. 1:15-cv-02640-JFM with contentions are oral argument adequately (D. Mullen v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Md. because presented in Feb. the the 8, 2016). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?