Samuel James v. United States of America
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999861758-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00827-REP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999972155]. Mailed to: S. James. [16-1547]
Appeal: 16-1547
Doc: 9
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1547
SAMUEL M. JAMES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00827-REP)
Submitted:
November 17, 2016
Before GREGORY,
Judges.
Chief
Judge,
Decided:
and
MOTZ
and
November 21, 2016
TRAXLER,
Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel M. James, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1547
Doc: 9
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel
M.
James
appeals
dismissing his complaint.
no reversible error.
stated
by
the
the
district
court’s
order
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
district
court.
James
v.
United
States,
No.
3:14-cv-00827-REP (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 10 & entered Mar. 11,
2016).
dispense
We deny James’ motion for appointment of counsel and
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?