Samuel James v. United States of America

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999861758-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00827-REP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999972155]. Mailed to: S. James. [16-1547]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1547 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1547 SAMUEL M. JAMES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00827-REP) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Before GREGORY, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: and MOTZ and November 21, 2016 TRAXLER, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel M. James, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1547 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Samuel M. James appeals dismissing his complaint. no reversible error. stated by the the district court’s order We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons district court. James v. United States, No. 3:14-cv-00827-REP (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 10 & entered Mar. 11, 2016). dispense We deny James’ motion for appointment of counsel and with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?