David Thomas Silvers, Sr. v. Iredell County DSS
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00083-RLV-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999948149]. Mailed to: David Thomas Silvers Sr. Apt. 201 1364 Pinecone Circle Virginia Beach, VA 23453. [16-1549]
Appeal: 16-1549
Doc: 18
Filed: 10/17/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1549
DAVID THOMAS SILVERS, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
IREDELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; DONALD C. WALL,
D.S.S. Dir., in individual and official capacities; PAXTON
BUTLER, Asst. D.A., in individual and official capacities;
CITY OF STATESVILLE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00083-RLV-DCK)
Submitted:
October 13, 2016
Decided:
October 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Thomas Silvers, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Patrick Houghton
Flanagan, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Charlotte, North
Carolina; James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE,
PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1549
Doc: 18
Filed: 10/17/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
Silvers,
appeals
PER CURIAM:
David
Thomas
Sr.,
the
orders denying relief on his civil complaint.
the record and find no reversible error.
district
court’s
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Silvers v. Iredell
Cty. DSS, No. 5:15-cv-00083-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016 & Apr.
15, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?