David Thomas Silvers, Sr. v. Iredell County DSS


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00083-RLV-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999948149]. Mailed to: David Thomas Silvers Sr. Apt. 201 1364 Pinecone Circle Virginia Beach, VA 23453. [16-1549]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1549 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/17/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1549 DAVID THOMAS SILVERS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. IREDELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; DONALD C. WALL, D.S.S. Dir., in individual and official capacities; PAXTON BUTLER, Asst. D.A., in individual and official capacities; CITY OF STATESVILLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:15-cv-00083-RLV-DCK) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Thomas Silvers, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Houghton Flanagan, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1549 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/17/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 Silvers, appeals PER CURIAM: David Thomas Sr., the orders denying relief on his civil complaint. the record and find no reversible error. district court’s We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Silvers v. Iredell Cty. DSS, No. 5:15-cv-00083-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016 & Apr. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?