Gerald Innocent v. The Bank of New York Mellon

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-01132-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999918693]. Mailed to: G. Innocent. [16-1556]

Appeal: 16-1556

Doc: 9

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1556

GERALD INNOCENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY; ERIN
SHAFFER, Esq.; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;
MELVIN C. HIGH,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:16cv-01132-PWG)

Submitted:

August 25, 2016

Decided:

August 29, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Innocent, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1556

Doc: 9

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Gerald
dismissing
appeal,

Innocent
his

we

civil

confine

Appellant’s brief.

appeals
action

our

the

as

review

district

barred
to

the

by

res

issues

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

court’s

order

judicata.
raised

in

On
the

Because Innocent’s

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Innocent has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order.

See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d

423,

Cir.

430

district

n.4

(4th

court’s

2004).

judgment.

We

Accordingly,
dispense

with

we

affirm

oral

the

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2