Pamela Bunker v. United States Army

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999827144-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00243-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999930733]. Mailed to: P Bunker. [16-1565]

Appeal: 16-1565

Doc: 7

Filed: 09/16/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1565

PAMELA JO BUNKER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES ARMY,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:16-cv-00243-REP)

Submitted:

September 13, 2016

Decided:

September 16, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pamela Jo Bunker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1565

Doc: 7

Filed: 09/16/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Pamela Jo Bunker appeals the district court’s order denying
leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

On appeal, we confine our

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
Cir.

R.

34(b).

Because

Bunker’s

informal

brief

See 4th
does

not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bunker
has

forfeited

appellate

review

of

the

court’s

order.

See

Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir.
2004).

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis

and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2