Pamela Bunker v. United States Army


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999827144-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00243-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999930733]. Mailed to: P Bunker. [16-1565]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1565 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1565 PAMELA JO BUNKER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ARMY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00243-REP) Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016 Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pamela Jo Bunker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1565 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Pamela Jo Bunker appeals the district court’s order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bunker’s informal brief See 4th does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bunker has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?