Rosa Benavides-Castro v. Loretta Lynch
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Petition for review denied [999827431-2] Originating case number: A206-311-520 Copies to all parties and the district court. . [16-1566]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ROSA GLORIA BENAVIDES-CASTRO,
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
December 15, 2016
January 4, 2017
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy R. Woods, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY R. WOODS, LLC, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Melissa Neiman-Kelting, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Anna Juarez, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Rosa Gloria Benavides-Castro, a native and citizen of El
immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding
of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript
of Benavides-Castro’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence.
We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling
contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8
supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.
478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board.
In re Benavides-Castro (B.I.A. Apr. 21,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?