Rosa Benavides-Castro v. Loretta Lynch


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Petition for review denied [999827431-2] Originating case number: A206-311-520 Copies to all parties and the district court. [999997323]. [16-1566]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1566 Doc: 22 Filed: 01/04/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1566 ROSA GLORIA BENAVIDES-CASTRO, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: January 4, 2017 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy R. Woods, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY R. WOODS, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Melissa Neiman-Kelting, Senior Litigation Counsel, Anna Juarez, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1566 Doc: 22 Filed: 01/04/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Rosa Gloria Benavides-Castro, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions Immigration Appeals for review (Board) of an order dismissing her of the appeal Board from of the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Benavides-Castro’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 2016). In re Benavides-Castro (B.I.A. Apr. 21, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?