Brandon Watson v. City of Aberdeen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00307-JKB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999976820]. [16-1573]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1573 Doc: 21 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1573 BRANDON WATSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CITY OF ABERDEEN; ABERDEEN POLICE DEPARTMENT; PFC. RAUL FOSMARK; DETECTIVE JOHN DIVEL; CPL. CRAIG GENTILE; HARRY FREDRICK BUDNICK; OFFICER THADDEUS TOMLINSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00307-JKB) Submitted: November 18, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jay Fred Cohen, LAW OFFICES OF JAY FRED COHEN, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Daniel Karp, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1573 Doc: 21 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Brandon Watson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm Watson v. 2016). legal before for the Aberdeen, reasons No. stated by the 1:15-cv-00307-JKB We Accordingly, district (D. have Md. court. Apr. 25, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?