Brandon Watson v. City of Aberdeen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00307-JKB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999976820]. [16-1573]
Appeal: 16-1573
Doc: 21
Filed: 11/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1573
BRANDON WATSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ABERDEEN; ABERDEEN POLICE DEPARTMENT; PFC. RAUL
FOSMARK; DETECTIVE JOHN DIVEL; CPL. CRAIG GENTILE; HARRY
FREDRICK BUDNICK; OFFICER THADDEUS TOMLINSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-00307-JKB)
Submitted:
November 18, 2016
Decided:
November 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Fred Cohen, LAW OFFICES OF JAY FRED COHEN, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellant. Daniel Karp, KARPINSKI, COLARESI &
KARP, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1573
Doc: 21
Filed: 11/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Watson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
Watson v.
2016).
legal
before
for
the
Aberdeen,
reasons
No.
stated
by
the
1:15-cv-00307-JKB
We
Accordingly,
district
(D.
have
Md.
court.
Apr.
25,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?