Charles Clair v. John Doe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-00713-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999972107]. Mailed to: Clair. [16-1585]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1585 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1585 CHARLES CLAIR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN DOE, CLERK OF THE STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF ST. MARY'S COUNTY, MD; JOHN DOE, Clerk of Circuit Court of St. Mary's County, MD, Defendants – Appellees, and THOMAS V. MIKE MILLER, JR., Attorney; PETER O'NEIL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:14cv-00713-PWG) Submitted: November 4, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Clair, Appellant Pro Se. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General, Jennifer L. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Appeal: 16-1585 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-1585 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Charles Clair appeals the district court’s orders granting the motion to dismiss his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying reconsideration. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clair v. Doe, No. 8:14- cv-00713-PWG (D. Md. Apr. 29, 2016; Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?