Amnah Qaiser v. SBA


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000096378].. [16-1586]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1586 Doc: 47 Filed: 06/07/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1586 AMNAH QAISER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; LINDA MCMAHON; VANESSA PICCIONI, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN) Submitted: May 24, 2017 Decided: June 7, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charity Chidinma Emeronye Swift, Stephen Christopher Swift, SWIFT & SWIFT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Andrew S. Han, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1586 Doc: 47 Filed: 06/07/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Amnah Qaiser appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to amend her complaint and granting Defendants summary judgment on Qaiser’s discrimination and hostile work environment harassment claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and have considered the parties’ arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Quaiser v. SBA, No. 1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 18, 2016 & entered Mar. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?