Amnah Qaiser v. SBA
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000096378].. [16-1586]
Appeal: 16-1586
Doc: 47
Filed: 06/07/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1586
AMNAH QAISER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; LINDA MCMAHON; VANESSA
PICCIONI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN)
Submitted: May 24, 2017
Decided: June 7, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charity Chidinma Emeronye Swift, Stephen Christopher Swift, SWIFT & SWIFT,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente,
United States Attorney, Andrew S. Han, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1586
Doc: 47
Filed: 06/07/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Amnah Qaiser appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to
amend her complaint and granting Defendants summary judgment on Qaiser’s
discrimination and hostile work environment harassment claims, brought pursuant to
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(2012). We have reviewed the record and have considered the parties’ arguments and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Quaiser v. SBA, No. 1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 18, 2016
& entered Mar. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?