Jay Clogg Realty Group, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-00493-DKC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000016465]. [16-1604]

Appeal: 16-1604

Doc: 30

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1604

JAY CLOGG REALTY GROUP, INC.; STANLEY ADOFF; AGV SPORTS
GROUP, INC.; MICHAEL PARROTTE; STEVEN G. BERRY; BREY CORP.;
DEBRA COLBERT; GERMANTOWN COPY CENTER, INC.; GOLD LEINS &
ADOFF; PEGGY HARRIS; HOLDEN ROGERS; KATHLYNNE RAMIREZ
ESQUIRE LLC; ANDREW RENGARTS; STEPHEN A. SHECHTEL; JAMES J.
TEMPLE JR. PA,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
JAY CLOGG; ELMECO ENGINEERING, INC.; TIBOR SARKADY; MICHAEL
BREY; JOHNNY R. GARZA; KENSINGTON PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC.;
STANLEY SHAPIRO; JAMES J. TEMPLE, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; METLIFE GROUP, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:15-cv-00493-DKC)

Submitted:

December 15, 2016

Decided:

Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

February 3, 2017

Appeal: 16-1604

Doc: 30

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Stephen H. Ring, STEPHEN H. RING, P.C., Rockville, Maryland, for
Appellants. Robert R. Niccolini, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK
& STEWART, P.C., Washington, D.C.; Daniel T. Stabile, SHUTTS &
BOWEN LLP, Miami, Florida, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1604

Doc: 30

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) request, and granting summary judgment in
favor of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and MetLife Group,
Inc., on Plaintiffs’ claims, brought pursuant to the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C.A. § 227 (West 2014 & Supp.
2016), and the Maryland Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Md.
Code Ann., Com. Law §§ 14-3201 to 14-3202 (West 2013).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

See Jay

Clogg Realty Grp., Inc. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 8:15-cv00493-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2016; May 2, 2016).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3